Used 1997 FordTaurus GL 3.0

 
    Exterior Color
    Green
    Interior Color
    Black
    Odometer
    93,965 miles
    Body/Seating
    Sedan/6 seats
    Fuel Economy
    20/28 MPG City/Hwy
    Transmission
    Automatic
    Drivetrain
    Front-wheel Drive
    Engine
    V6 SFI / FRONT WHEEL DRIVE
    VIN
    1FALP52U1VA190338
    Stock Number
    10216A
    Ford Taurus
    • Certified

    Included Packages & Options

    • Engine: 3.0L V6 Methanol Flexible Fuel$1,165
      • Engine Block Immersion Heater

    Included Packages & Accessories

    • Trip Odometer
    • Intermittent Wipers
    • Cloth Interior
    • Power Door Locks
    • Power Brakes
    • Power Windows
    • CD player
    • Center Arm Rest
    • Cruise Control
    • Power Mirrors
    • Active Handling
    • Cup Holder
    • Power-Assist Disc Brakes
    • Power Steering
    • Air Conditioning
    • Alloy Wheels
    • Climate Control
    • Traction Control System
    • Anti-Lock Brakes (ABS)
    • Transmission: 4-Speed Automatic w/OD
    • Engine: 3.0L EFI V6
    • Engine Block Immersion Heater
    • Engine: 3.0L V6 Methanol Flexible Fuel

    Detailed Specifications

    • 1-touch down
    • Air conditioning
    • Driver vanity mirror
    • Front beverage holders
    • Passenger vanity mirror
    • Power windows
    • Tilt steering wheel
    • Four wheel independent suspension
    • Front anti-roll bar
    • Front tires: 205/65TR15.0
    • Power steering
    • Rear anti-roll bar
    • Rear tires: 205/65TR15.0
    • Speed-sensing steering
    • AM/FM radio
    • Speakers: 4
    • Front center armrest: w/storage
    • Front seats: bench
    • Max seating capacity: 6
    • Rear seats: bench
    • Split folding rear seat
    • Cylinder configuration: V-6
    • Drive type: front-wheel
    • Engine liters: 3.0
    • Engine location: front
    • Fuel economy city: 20mpg
    • Fuel economy highway: 28mpg
    • Fuel tank capacity: 16.1gal.
    • Horsepower: 145hp @ 5,250RPM
    • Number of valves: 12
    • Sequential multi-point fuel injection
    • Torque: 170 lb.-ft. @ 3,250RPM
    • Transmission: 4 speed automatic
    • Bodyside moldings
    • Bumpers: body-color
    • Door mirrors: body-color
    • Power door mirrors
    • Rear cargo: trunk
    • Curb weight: 1,509kg (3,326lbs)
    • Engine bore x stroke: 89.0mm x 80.0mm (3.50" x 3.15")
    • Engine displacement: 3.0 L
    • Engine horsepower: 145hp @ 5,250RPM
    • Engine torque: 170 lb.-ft. @ 3,250RPM
    • Exterior body width: 1,854mm (73.0")
    • Exterior height: 1,400mm (55.1")
    • Exterior length: 5,017mm (197.5")
    • Front headroom: 996mm (39.2")
    • Front hiproom: 1,417mm (55.8")
    • Front legroom: 1,082mm (42.6")
    • Front shoulder room: 1,458mm (57.4")
    • Interior cargo volume: 447 L (16 cu.ft.)
    • Passenger volume: 2,874L (101.5 cu.ft.)
    • Rear headroom: 919mm (36.2")
    • Rear hiproom: 1,430mm (56.3")
    • Rear legroom: 988mm (38.9")
    • Rear shoulder room: 1,438mm (56.6")
    • Towing capacity: 567kg (1,250lbs)
    • Turning radius: 5.8m (19.0')
    • Wheelbase: 2,756mm (108.5")
    • Display: analog
    • Rear window defroster
    • Tachometer
    • Variably intermittent wipers
    • Dual front impact airbags

    Standard Features

    • Engine Block Immersion Heater

    Dealer Notes

    RAMSEY CORP IS HOME OF GUARANTEED CREDIT APPROVAL!

    1997 FORD TAURUS GL
    1FALP52U1VA190338
    SEDAN 4 DR 3.0L V6 SFI
    FRONT WHEEL DRIVE

    1997 Ford Taurus

    In 1995, Ford officials told me that the shape of the new Taurus would grow on me over time.

    Well, two years down the road has proved Ford correct. I dislike the Taurus' design quite a bit less than I did.

    Perhaps all the Taurus really needs is a redesign of the rear end, some nicer-looking taillights and a more cleanly designed trunk lid. In any case, I almost like it. The avant-garde styling is starting to look familiar.

    Even though some people still consider the shape of the Taurus to be controversial, few would argue that Ford engineers smacked a solid hit with the car's performance, handling and quality.

    Technically, this is an excellent car. And it's hard not to like a car as well-made as the Taurus.

    I tested the SHO version, which has a high-performance engine, suspension system and brakes. It is designed for those who would like a BMW-like sports sedan but don't have $45,000 or so to spend.

    PERFORMANCE, HANDLING

    The Taurus SHO is powered by a3.4-liter, double-overhead cam V-8 engine that has four valves per cylinder. The lightweight engine, which is made of aluminum, develops 235 horsepower.

    A four-speed automatic transmission is the only gearbox available. The previous generation SHO could be ordered with a five-speed stick shift, but only about 5 percent of SHO buyers ordered the manual transmission, so Ford dropped it from the option list when the new SHO came out last year.

    By the way, this SHO is the first Taurus to be powered by a V-8, and it's the only Ford vehicle to use the 3.4-liter engine.

    Performance is excellent at all speeds. The SHO is fast from a stop, and it delivers plenty of punch all the way to the red line on the tachometer. The smooth-running engine makes a serious snarl as it revs, underscoring the performance nature of the car and giving it plenty of character.

    The original V-6-powered SHO attracted a cult following for its wonderful high-performance engine and sensible design. The new model takes the SHO to the next level. This is a serious performance sports sedan. Motor Trend tested an SHO recently and clocked a 0-to-60 mph time of 7.5 seconds.

    The SHO has just one American-made competitor, the new Pontiac Grand Prix GTP. Chrysler doesn't really offer a true high-performance sports sedan, and neither do any of the Japanese automakers who build cars here.

    Motor Trend also tested a 1997 Pontiac Grand Prix GTP, which has five more horsepower, costs $5,000 less and races from 0 to 60 mph in 6.6 seconds. So the SHO takes a back seat to the Pontiac is several areas.

    Though the SHO's acceleration is strong, it does not have the same finesse as the Grand Prix GTP, the best car I tested last year.

    Under full acceleration from a stop, you can feel what engineers call torque steer, a slight pull to the left or right. You won't feel it unless you hammer the accelerator from a dead stop. It's not dangerous, but it gives th e SHO a slightly unrefined feeling.

    However, there is nothing else about the car's handling performance that is less than excellent.

    The powerful four-wheel disc brakes are fabulous. They have a strong confidence-inspiring feel, and the anti-lock system is smooth and quiet. I also like the firm, speed-sensitive power rack-and-pinion steering system. When you turn the wheel, the SHO responds instantly.

    Ford engineers did a superb job tuning the SHO's four-wheel independent suspension. The car is extremely quiet. When you are driving over the roughest brick roads, you hear only the sound of the tires. The stiff body allows the suspension to absorb the energy from bumps without transmitting much of the ruckus to the interior.

    Overall, the SHO got 15 miles per gallon in combined city/highway driving. This is far below EPA estimates. But I drove the car with a heavy foot, and the car wasn't broken in (it had only 218 miles on the odometer when it was delivered.)O ce a car gets to 2,000 miles or so, the parts loosen up abit and the mileage improves.

    FIT AND FINISH

    In many ways the new Taurus is a world-class automobile.

    The solid way the doors close makes you think that Ford sculpted the SHO from a single block of steel.

    Ford's interior decorators really sweated the details, making sure all the various trim pieces look good and fit right. The analog instruments, featuring white numbers on a black background, were easy to read and well laid out.

    The controversial part of the interior is the integrated control panel, or ICP, in the center of the dash. Within the oval area, Ford has placed all the buttons for the air conditioner, defroster and radio. This gives the Taurus a very futuristic look. Unfortunately, form does not follow function very well. Many of the buttons are the same size and shape, so changing the settings can be somewhat distracting. However, after a few days, I learned where each button was located.

    The sumptuous tan leather seats didn't take any getting used to at all. I liked them immediately. The front bucket seats were very comfortable and extremely supportive of my lower back and thighs. I made several two-hour trips and felt no fatigue.

    Rearpassengerswill find plenty of head, leg and foot room. The rear seats split and fold forward, which is somewhat unusual for a mid-size car. There is plenty of room to transport long objects.

    My major gripe with the SHO is its price - $30,000 is a lot of money for a Ford Taurus, even if it has a high-performance motor and all the bells and whistles of an import.

    Even though our test car came fully loaded, including such things as a six-disc CD player, an electric sunroof and a full array of power accessories, I feel as if Ford has placed too high a price on the SHO for it to sell in large numbers.

    Having tested both true mid-size American sports sedans, I feel that the Pontiac Grand Prix GTP is much better looking and that it has the edge on the Taurus SHO when it comes to value for the dollar. With the Grand Prix you pay less and get more than you do with the SHO.

    Specifications:

    1997 Ford Taurus SHO Base price: $26,640. Safety: Dual air bags, anti-lock brakes, side-impact protection, daytime running lights, front and rear crumple zones. Price as tested: $30,380. EPA rating: 17 mpg city/26 mpg highway. Incentives: $1,000.

    Truett's tip: The Taurus SHO is quick, comfortable, well-equipped and tightly assembled. It handles well and is a pleasure to drive. However, it may be priced too high.

    KBB.com Consumer Reviews

    Kelley Blue Book - KBB.com
    Overall4Out of 5
    • Great Reliable car!

      By JohnInTN on Monday, January 28, 2008

      5.0
      I bought this car new 10 years ago and now have 182,000 miles on it. It has the 24V V6 engine and has been virtually problem-free. I spent about $120 to replace a pump perhaps 5 years ago, and now just replaced the O2 sensor; replaced a turn signal lamp last year; also have an issue with interior lights not recognizing when doors are shut- so I had to take out the overhead lamps- aside from those items- regular maintenance- and this car has been excellent. I have been very pleased and certainly got my $$ out of it...now on 4th set of tires!
    • The Ideal Value Car...of 1996

      By TheDailyDriver on Wednesday, July 25, 2018

      4.0
      Ignore your previous judgements of this car or of Ford as a company. This car designed with comfort in mind without paying a fortune for it. Lets start with some pros. Pros: - Extremely easy to drive (especially for a wagon) - Ride quality for the price is great. - Low problems as far as cars go. - Comfortable interior and sleek exterior. And now, for the cons. Cons: - Not thrilling to drive (Slow acceleration and loose steering) - Poor MPG, being 19 city and 24 highway - Transmission reliability is generally poor beyond 100K - Wont impress anyone (If you even care about this) Conclusion: I love weird cars, especially because this looks like a spider with a huge behind. No one likes the underdog, and this makes me have even more respect for it. The one I own has almost no damage to it, meaning its paint is still shiny and its interior bright and plush. It REALLY looks like a 90s car, because it is. Its sluggish performance almost forces you to drive like a normal human being, so it is a GREAT first car. I wash it and pamper it like a Mustang, because every car needs love. Everyone I show it to is surprised with how good it still looks and how well it rides. In the end, it is a great car that is limited by your view. If you see a cheap one, try the Ford Taurus.
    • Never let me down, rare repairs usually cheap

      By SGillnois on Tuesday, January 03, 2012

      5.0
      Purchased new, drove it for 205,000 miles for 13-1/2 years. Loved the car, never broke down on me. Only required one major repair: the air conditioning system required replacement after about 9 years. 24V DOHC Duratec engine lived up to its name - the best running, lowest maintenance engine I have ever owned. Never burned oil, but at the very end a gasket needed replacement (slow oil leak), but it cost too much labor to replace (required removal of other components). Had to replace the turn signal stalk, dome light started staying on at times (couldn't figure out where the problem was). Replaced both rear sway bar links, struts needed replacement. That's about it - incredibly few issues for so many years and miles. Never a transmission problem. Got rid of it because of underbody rust - northern Illinois uses a tremendous amount of road salt that causes significant corrosion. Every vehicle I have owned (Ford, Mercury, Toyota, Oldsmobile) have succumbed to rust (except for my one and only Chrysler product - the engine and transmission beat the rust). No visible body rust, just underside.